Apple in March came out with the updated 2022 iPhone SE, a budget iPhone that’s equipped with 5G. Samsung also recently came out with its own budget 5G smartphone, the Galaxy A53 5G, so we thought we’d compare the two to see how they measure up. In short, the A53 5G is offering up a better feature set, but it can’t match the iPhone SE in terms of lifespan and build quality.
Subscribe to the MacRumors YouTube channel for more videos.
On paper, the Galaxy A53 5G offers a wide suite of features that the iPhone can’t match. When it comes to the display, for example, the Galaxy A53 5G has a more modern edge-to-edge 6.5-inch 1080p AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, while the iPhone SE is sporting a smaller 4.7-inch display with thick, outdated bezels. The display is bright, vibrant, and at 1080p, noticeably better than the iPhone SE display.
Samsung has also equipped its smartphone with an ultrasonic fingerprint reader that’s under the display and facial recognition, while the iPhone SE is using a standard Touch ID Home button, but Samsung’s ultrasonic fingerprint reader is slower and less accurate than Touch ID, and the facial recognition is not on the Face ID level. It can be used for unlocking the smartphone, but not for making payments or authenticating passwords. Touch ID is being phased out from the iPhone, but it’s still quick, responsive, and simple to use.
The Galaxy A53 5G is made from plastic, and it just feels cheaper than the iPhone SE, which is fully glass with aluminum siding. It’s clearly made from better quality materials, and it has a more premium feel than the Galaxy A53 5G, which feels like your average budget Android device.
The A53 5G wins out when it comes to battery life because it offers almost double the capacity of the iPhone SE. The iPhone SE is, however, much, much faster than the A53 because it’s using the same A15 chip that’s in the iPhone 13. Samsung’s smartphone is equipped with an Exynos 1280 chip that doesn’t even come close to measuring up. Samsung does have the edge when it comes to storage, as the base model starts with 128GB and it can be expanded with an SD card slot (the iPhone SE starts at 64GB), plus it has more camera lenses.
Apple’s iPhone SE has a single-lens 12-megapixel wide-angle rear camera, while the Galaxy S53 5G has a 64-megapixel wide-angle camera, an ultra wide lens, and a depth and macro sensor. Of course, more megapixels and more lenses does not equal better quality, and the iPhone SE has texture, detail, and HDR features powered by the A15 that set it apart.
Both phones have 5G and are equal in that department, and as for pricing, the Galaxy A53 5G is technically priced at $449, but it’s available for $349 right now. That’s cheaper than the iPhone SE, which is priced starting at $429.
Though the Galaxy A53 5G seems like the better phone right now, it’s the A15 chip that makes the iPhone SE stand out. Apple will provide software updates, new features, and support for the iPhone SE for a good five to seven years, while Samsung is not going to support the A53 5G that long. The Galaxy A53 5G has a flashier set of features that may be immediately appealing, but those looking for a phone that’s going to last for years to should check out the iPhone SE.
What do you think of the Galaxy A53 5G, do you prefer it to the iPhone SE? Let us know in the comments.Related Roundup: iPhone SETag: SamsungBuyer’s Guide: iPhone SE (Buy Now)Related Forum: iPhone
This article, “Budget Phone Comparison: Apple’s iPhone SE vs. Samsung’s Galaxy A53 5G” first appeared on MacRumors.com
Discuss this article in our forums
